It's always hard to pinpoint the specific lobbying that has taken root,
Secure esignature XML software.
At the time the law was passed, there were 48 states
accepting
e-signatures. There was pressure to get some measure of federal
oversight to keep the states from going in their own direction. Now that
we have a legal construct in the form of the Federal legislation, as
well as the state legislation, we're moving toward that time when we can
specifically define what a
legally binding e-signature looks like. From
my perspective, the greatest impact of this law is to bring to light the
fact that there is technology out there that can provide the same
measure of authenticity in the Secure esignature XML software online world as through pen and paper in
the offline world.
Secure esignature
XML software,
What practices are
involved in an e-signature implementation?
|
Secure esignature XML software, The federal law is nebulous in terms of
specific technologies recommended or the processes that need to be put
in place to issue a credential and to use in a transaction. In terms of
this law having a little rule book saying how to design a product to
meet the requirements of this law, [the law is] just not cooked that way
to be able to build product requirements. You talk to customers and ask,
"What do you need to solve your business problems?" Secure esignature
XML software - Then you work with them.
A lot of that is going to be determined by
the specific problem an organization is trying to solve. In cases where
a company does centralized purchasing, an
e-signature
assigned to an organization could be binding in specific trading
partnerships. If you're sending secure e-mail, on the other hand,
everyone that wants to send mail would have to have a Secure
esignature XML software certificate.
|
